 |
Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future by Chris Mooney, Sheril Kirshenbaum
Book Summary InformationAuthor: Chris Mooney, Sheril Kirshenbaum Edition: Hardcover Audio: English (Unknown); English (Original Language); English (Published) Published: 2009-07-14 ISBN: 0465013058 Number of pages: 224 Publisher: Basic Books
Book Reviews of Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our FutureBook Review: A good overview of the societal forces arrayed against science Summary: 5 Stars
The book includes a nice overview of how science has fallen from public grace during the last 40 years (although certainly not in a straight line, especially during Carl Sagan's heyday) as well as outlining some present-day interests that are increasing the divide between science and mainstream America.
Among them is the decline of science in mainstream journalism, and this part of the book speaks directly to me, especially the following passage:
"Meanwhile, those reporters who stick around the newsroom are increasingly required to become part-time bloggers, posting their stories 0nline and them updating them throughout the day, extending their energy struggling to keep up with the twenty-four-hour news cycle rather than being able to dig in, investigate, learn, reveal."
Amen. I have far less time today than I would like to really dig deep into stories.
While discussing the role of poor science education, science-phobic politicians and religious ideologues in undermining science's place in society, ultimately the book places much of the blame at the feet of scientists themselves.
This is a brave, but appropriate, thing to do in a book whose primary audience probably consists of scientists.
In any case, Mooney and Kirshenbaum persuasively make a couple of points that have already proved unpopular in the burgeoning community of science bloggers:
1) New Atheism will not endear science to the 90 percent of Americans who believe in God, and 2) Science blogging may actually degrade American scientific culture, rather than revitalize it.
On the atheism point, the book drew immediate criticism from Pharyngula, a popular New Atheism blog. While I am certainly sympathetic to the right of anyone to hold his or her own beliefs, what New Atheists ignore is that their shrillness gives all of science a very, very poor reputation in middle America.
Secondly, on blogging, I think the following point is the most salient from the book:
"The single biggest blogging negative, however, is the grouping together of people who already agree about everything, and who then proceed to square and cube their agreements, becoming increasingly self-assured and intolerant of other viewpoints. Thus, blogging about science has brought out, in some cases, the loud, angry, nasty, and profanity-strewing minority of the science world that denounces the rest of America for its ignorance and superstition."
I couldn't agree more. And this just doesn't happen among scientists, of course. This trend toward echo-chamber communities on the Web really decreases the opportunities for meaningful dialogue among those who disagree.
The end of the book looks at possible solutions to raise the position of science in society, but I'm not sure the authors have got this quite right.
They write about the development of "Renaissance scientists," and the need to teach speaking and outreach skills as part of graduate school in the sciences. This is good and right, but I'm not sure it's going to get us there. I thought this section of the book felt somewhat flat and rushed.
This may be because there really aren't any great solutions. The book does such a good job of highlighting the problems its difficult to envision solutions that could meet all of the factors working against science in popular culture.
Finally, for those concerned that the book will have strong political overtones like Mooney's The Republican War on Science, no one party is overwhelmingly blamed, and indeed the authors are quick to point out that the election of Barack Obama isn't likely to be a panacea.
Summary of Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our FutureIn his famous 1959 Rede lecture at Cambridge University, the scientifically-trained novelist C.P. Snow described science and the humanities as "two cultures," separated by a "gulf of mutual incomprehension." And the humanists had all the cultural power?the low prestige of science, Snow argued, left Western leaders too little educated in scientific subjects that were increasingly central to world problems: the elementary physics behind nuclear weapons, for instance, or the basics of plant science needed to feed the world's growing population. Now, Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum, a journalist-scientist team, offer an updated "two cultures" polemic for America in the 21st century. Just as in Snow's time, some of our gravest challenges?climate change, the energy crisis, national economic competitiveness?and gravest threats--global pandemics, nuclear proliferation?have fundamentally scientific underpinnings. Yet we still live in a culture that rarely takes science seriously or has it on the radar. For every five hours of cable news, less than a minute is devoted to science; 46 percent of Americans reject evolution and think the Earth is less than 10,000 years old; the number of newspapers with weekly science sections has shrunken by two-thirds over the past several decades. The public is polarized over climate change?an issue where political party affiliation determines one's view of reality?and in dangerous retreat from childhood vaccinations. Meanwhile, only 18 percent of Americans have even met a scientist to begin with; more than half can't name a living scientist role model. For this dismaying situation, Mooney and Kirshenbaum don't let anyone off the hook. They highlight the anti-intellectual tendencies of the American public (and particularly the politicians and journalists who are supposed to serve it), but also challenge the scientists themselves, who despite the best of intentions have often failed to communicate about their work effectively to a broad public?and so have ceded their critical place in the public sphere to religious and commercial propagandists. A plea for enhanced scientific literacy, Unscientific America urges those who care about the place of science in our society to take unprecedented action. We must begin to train a small army of ambassadors who can translate science's message and make it relevant to the media, to politicians, and to the public in the broadest sense. An impassioned call to arms worthy of Snow's original manifesto, this book lays the groundwork for reintegrating science into the public discourse--before it's too late.
|
 |
|
|
|