 |
The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America by Louis Menand
Book Summary InformationAuthor: Louis Menand Edition: Paperback Audio: English (Unknown); English (Original Language); English (Published) Published: 2002-04-10 ISBN: 0374528497 Number of pages: 568 Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Book Reviews of The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in AmericaBook Review: Four Intellectual Giants Summary: 5 Stars
In The Metaphysical Club, author Louis Menand traces the lives of four intellectual giants whose philosophies transformed American antebellum sensibilities and birthed a new mode of construing truth, value, and ethics. Three of these--William James, Charles Sanders Peirce, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, all young men during the Civil War--witnessed the ravaging consequences of decisions (i.e., waging war) that followed deductively from a priori principles (i.e., the right of regional autonomy or the rectitude of abolitionism). Collectively, these three, along with a younger John Dewey, chased a new vision of truth--not an abiding order of the universe uncovered by science or religion, but rather a social construction that is legitimized first by its utility. This is American pragmatism: The insight that ideas are not only justified by their practical effects, but are in fact are made real by their consequences.
The Metaphysical Club corrects shallow or mistaken impressions of central figures in American thought.
* John Dewey, commonly regarded as the great American education theorist and torchbearer of progressive education, was above all a philosopher. An enthusiast of the philosophical systematizer, Hegel, Dewey took the universe to be organically connected--everything was related to all, and categories that emphasized distinctions often fail to appreciate this organic connectivity. Dewey criticized the division of knowledge (including philosophical knowledge) and action. And so, progressive education sprung not so much from Dewey's passion for advancing pedagogy, but more so as a test of the philosophical position that all knowledge is interconnected, and that ideas and actions are obverse sides of one coin. The famed "Dewey" laboratory school at the University of Chicago was above all a laboratory for testing a philosophy--though one that offered its students a truer experience than was typical of American education.
* William James, great American psychologist, was the first to formulate pragmatism as a theory. Trained originally as a medical doctor and then as a philosopher, James laid the cornerstone of American psychology with the 1890 publication of his monumental textbook, Principles of Psychology. James's intellectual trajectory ricocheted also to spiritualism and semiotics. His polymathic resume was as much a product of his indecisiveness as it was of universal fascination for every subject that touched on the meaning of human existence. To James, experience was the basis of all knowledge, but James saw experience as broader than mental events directly prompted by sensory stimuli (as the philosophical empiricists emphasized). Rather, experience included all mental events, whether prompted by the senses or otherwise derived from genetic potential, mystical introspection, psychotropic drugs, or some other source.
* Oliver Wendell Holmes, born of a Boston Brahmin family, witnessed firsthand the devastation of the Civil War. Inspired initially to join the armies of the North by conviction of the rightness of its cause, he came to regard the slaughter of young men as absurdly disconnected from its justifying principles. Later, as a lawyer and judge, and ultimately as Supreme Court Justice, Holmes maintained a stance that justice and morality must be understood, and indeed are defined by, the social consequences of particular judgments. Often mistaken by progressives as a torchbearer for their cause, Holmes had no philosophical qualms about placing individual rights beneath considerations of the common good. Holmes' pragmatism was social and contextual, and so placed in doubt assumptions of the inalienable rights of individuals.
* Charles Sanders Peirce, largely forgotten in the American intellectual landscape, was a brilliant scientist, mathematician, logician, philosopher, and founder of the discipline of American semiotics. Semiotic theory holds that all meaning in the universe is conveyed through signs--that is, signifiers that trigger signification. Words are signs in that their arbitrary sound sequences ("dog") can produce a cascade of meaning (four-legged animal, tail, fur, barks). Peirce recognized that language is but one variety of sign--others include gestures, symbols, icons, natural objects, animal tracks, and human artifacts. Civilization, nature, and indeed the entire universe, is replete with signs. Though brilliant as evidenced by such insights, Peirce was also combative and arrogant, and he easily offended the powerful men who could promote him. He never held a tenured position at a university and was, at times in his long life, a fugitive from the law, homeless, and starving. But his intellectual legacy is profound, anchoring not only semiotic theory, but also an emerging vision of knowledge that holds tremendous potential for illuminating the history of philosophy and the cognitive sciences, as well as new visions of the meaning of education.
In The Metaphysical Club, Menand weaves the biographies of these four cornerstones of American pragmatism, and shows how their lives intersected. It shows how these four influenced, and were influenced by, other luminaries: Ralph Waldo Emerson, Louis Agassiz, Charles Darwin, Daniel Webster, and Franz Boas. Above all, the spotlighted quartet knew each other and influenced one another deeply. James and Peirce were lifelong friends; James was one of the few who could tolerate the irascible Peirce as well as keep pace with him intellectually. Later in life, James rescued Peirce from penury by sponsoring a paid lecture series at Harvard. James, Peirce, and Holmes knew each other in Cambridge, Massachusetts--Holmes' and Peirce's fathers were Harvard faculty members. Briefly, they established a weekly discussion forum--the Metaphysical Club--at a Cambridge house where free-ranging discussions shaped emerging definitions of reality, truth, morality, and justice that are varieties of pragmatism. The Metaphysical Club was briefly revived at Johns Hopkins when Peirce held a lectureship and John Dewey was a graduate student. Dewey and James later corresponded, traded manuscripts, and shared mutual admiration for the other's intellectual insights.
Menand's Metaphysical Club shows that the intellectual paths of the luminaries of pragmatism pursued a common problem that was philosophical in essence, but that also deeply touched mathematics, jurisprudence, ontology, religion, epistemology, and human evolution. It also guided, even defined, modes of thought that underlay the emergence of modern scholarship.
Education As the Cultivation of Intelligence (Volume in the Educational Psychology Series)
Learning and Cognition: The Design of the Mind
Summary of The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in AmericaThe Metaphysical Club is the winner of the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for History. A riveting, original book about the creation of modern American thought.The Metaphysical Club was an informal group that met in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1872, to talk about ideas. Its members included Oliver Well Holmes, Jr., future associate justice of the United States Supreme Court; William James, the father of modern American psychology; and Charles Sanders Peirce, logician, scientist, and the founder of semiotics. The Club was probably in existence for about nine months. No records were kept. The one thing we know that came out of it was an idea -- an idea about ideas. This book is the story of that idea. Holmes, James, and Peirce all believed that ideas are not things "out there" waiting to be discovered but are tools people invent -- like knives and forks and microchips -- to make their way in the world. They thought that ideas are produced not by individuals, but by groups of individuals -- that ideas are social. They do not develop according to some inner logic of their own but are entirely depent -- like germs -- on their human carriers and environment. And they thought that the survival of any idea deps not on its immutability but on its adaptability. The Metaphysical Club is written in the spirit of this idea about ideas. It is not a history of philosophy but an absorbing narrative about personalities and social history, a story about America. It begins with the Civil War and s in 1919 with Justice Holmes's dissenting opinion in the case of U.S. v. Abrams-the basis for the constitutional law of free speech. The first four sections of the book focus on Holmes, James, Peirce, and their intellectual heir, John Dewey. The last section discusses some of the fundamental twentieth-century ideas they are associated with. This is a book about a way of thinking that changed American life." If past is prologue, then The Metaphysical Club by Louis Menand may suggest an intellectual course for the United States in the 21st century. At least Menand, a frequent contributor to The New Yorker and The New York Review of Books, thinks so. This enthralling study of Oliver Wendell Holmes, William James, Charles Sanders Peirce, and John Dewey shows how these four men developed a philosophy of pragmatism following the Civil War, a period Menand likens to post-cold-war times. Together, "they were more responsible than any other group for moving American thought into the modern world." Despite this potentially forbidding theme, The Metaphysical Club is not a dry tome for academics. Instead, it is a quadruple biography, a wonderfully told story of ideas that advances by turning these thinkers into characters and bringing them to life. Menand links them through the Metaphysical Club, a conversational club formed in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1872. It lasted but a few months, and references to it appear only in Peirce's writings (its real significance seems rather limited), though Holmes and James were both members. (Dewey was much younger than these three, and more an heir than a contemporary.) It is difficult to describe in a sentence or two what they accomplished, though Menand takes a stab at it: "They helped put an end to the idea that the universe is an idea, that beyond the mundane business of making our way as best we can in a world shot through with contingency, there exists some order, invisible to us, whose logic we transgress at our peril." Academic freedom and cultural pluralism are just two of their legacies, and they are linchpins of democracy in a nonideological age, says Menand. A book like this is necessarily idiosyncratic, yet at the same time this one is sweeping. It presents an accessible survey of intellectual life from roughly the end of the Civil War to the start of the cold war. Dozens of figures receive fascinating thumbnail sketches, from Ralph Waldo Emerson and Charles Darwin to Jane Addams and Eugene Debs. The result is a grand portrait of an age that will appeal to anyone with even a modest interest in the history of philosophy and ideas. --John Miller
|
 |