How Judges Think
by Richard A. Posner
List Price:
Our Price: $13.99
You Save: $15.96 (53%)
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Category: Book
See more book details and other editions
Book Summary Information
Author: Richard A. PosnerEdition: Hardcover
Published: 2008-04-15
ISBN: 0674028201
Number of pages: 408
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Book Reviews of How Judges Think
Book Review: Judges Rule: Are American Judges Political or Pragmatic?
Summary: 4 Stars
Richard Posner, one of America's leading Legal Scholars, has breathtaking range: from Aging (Aging and Old Age) and Intelligence (Uncertain Shield: The U.S. Intelligence System in the Throes of Reform (Hoover Studies in Politics, Economics, and Society)) to Sex (Sex and Reason) and Terrorism (Countering Terrorism: Blurred Focus, Halting Steps). In this book Posner returns to one of the main themes of his scholarship - the failure of Formalist judging and the possibility of Pragmatism as an alternative. This is a recurring theme for Posner (see my reviews of "Sex and Reason" and Overcoming Law, and especially Posner's The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory) and one on which he can speak from experience: He's a Judge of the US Court of Appeal for the 7th Circuit.
Posner's book is a collection of articles published elsewhere; Its main theme is constructed from Law articles, a survey of the Supreme Court's 2004 term, various book reviews, and even, I think, Blog posts. The end product offers fascinating discussions of many topics, but it feels somewhat disjoint, as if Posner was constantly being sidetracked, albeit in interesting directions.
Posner's main argument, one that would find no disagreement from me, is that American Judges are not Formalists. Formalists argue that legal decisions are (or should be) made in an algorithmic fashion - that there is only one right answer, and that it is independent of the Judge's personality and politics.
That judicial decisions are not Formally determinable, at least in the most interesting cases, has been argued for centuries. Posner demolishes some of the tropes of Formalism old ("reasoning by analogy" pp. 181-190) and new-ish ("Originalism" pp. 343-345) and offers statistical evidence that US judges are not Formalist: the opinions of judges appointed by Democratic administrations differ from those of Republican appointed ones.
But if judges are not legalistic, what are they? Are there only two choices - legalistic (unfeasible in many cases) or political (As Justice Scalia suggests in an article titled "Originalism - the Lesser Evil")? In this and other writing, Posner offers an alternative: Pragmatism.
Pragmatism can help constrain Judges and decide cases in ways that would not seem to be political. A Posnerian Pragmatist should judge cases in which the Formalist apparatus breaks down in three ways:
First, in some fields there exists a "limited... field-specific ideological consensus" (p. 373). In contracts and torts, property law and bankruptcy law - the traditional domains of the Common Law - the basic ideological issues are agreed upon. Therefore judges can use instrumental reasoning as to how best achieve agreed upon goals.
Second, in areas upon which there is little consensus, such as Constitutional Law, the Posnerian Judge would be a minimalist. Subjecting oneself to Oliver Wendell Holmes's " "Puke Test" - a statue is unconstitutional only if it makes you want to throw up... a conviction of error is not enough - there must be revulsion" (p. 288). Judges would be mostly deferential to the "political" branches.
The third, most interesting element of Posner's Jurisprudence is the reliance on Social Science. Posner believes that by immersing oneself in the facts of the case, and in relevant scientific knowledge, one can sometimes transcend the personal dimension of the decision. Essentially, the social sciences can help move an issue from the second category - that of contested moral principles - to the first, thus achieving
an "apolitical" or Pragmatic, ruling.
Pragmatism is not a cure all for legal dilemmas; They can have more than one pragmatic answer. Take the Kelo case (Kelo v. City of New London, pp. 314-320). New London used its power of "eminent domain", forcing landowners to sell land to it at market prices, and then gave the land for public contractors to use in an urban development project. This appropriation of private property was understandably unpopular among owners, who probably estimated the land at a higher value than its market value - otherwise, they would have sold it willingly.
The economic justification for thus appropriating land is the `hold out' problem - sometimes, particular lots are necessary for a project. If they are, the owners, facing no competition, can hold out for a very high price. The power of "eminent domain" is thus an anti-monopoly device.
One pragmatic solution to the case would have been asking whether the situation in Kelo was a `hold out' situation. If so, justification existed for the use of the eminent domain. If not, its use was essentially subsidizing private contractors at the expense of the owners.
Instead of thus resolving the case, the Supreme Court refused to intervene in a political issue. That result, Posner reports, was a pragmatic triumph also. By refusing to defend owners against government action, the Court pushed owners to the public sphere, where they can fight the government's power "The responses of Congress and the states will constitute a series of social experiments from which much will be learned about the proper limits on eminent domain" (p. 319).
Is Posner's prognosis, limited as it is, only normative or also positive? Are US Judges really pragmatic? I think that, unfortunately, they are not. First, the Justices in the Kelo case showed little interest in the Social science behind the use of eminent domain. Application of social sciences in other cases is faulty and undisciplined (pp. 297-299). All the current Justices had been Court of Appeal Judges - did they forget their pragmatism when promoted? The Justices are not a representative sample of US judges, but is there any reason to think they are less empirically inclined?
Indeed, despite Posner's assurance that "Judges are curious about [social reality]... they want the lawyers to help them dig below the semantic surface." (p. 228), I wonder why we can't see that in practice. Law is a highly competitive business. If social science would give lawyers an edge in winning cases, one would think competition would teach lawyers how to use it. Factual, "Brandeis", briefs have been around... well, since Brandeis. Why aren't they making more of an effect?
My guess is that Posner is still an anomaly. Most American judges are not Pragmatists. Maybe we will "overcome law" some day, but we aren't there yet.
Summary of How Judges Think
A distinguished and experienced appellate court judge, Richard A. Posner offers in this new book a unique and, to orthodox legal thinkers, a startling perspective on how judges and justices decide cases. When conventional legal materials enable judges to ascertain the true facts of a case and apply clear pre-existing legal rules to them, Posner argues, they do so straightforwardly; that is the domain of legalist reasoning. However, in non-routine cases, the conventional materials run out and judges are on their own, navigating uncharted seas with equipment consisting of experience, emotions, and often unconscious beliefs. In doing so, they take on a legislative role, though one that is confined by internal and external constraints, such as professional ethics, opinions of respected colleagues, and limitations imposed by other branches of government on freewheeling judicial discretion. Occasional legislators, judges are motivated by political considerations in a broad and sometimes a narrow sense of that term. In that open area, most American judges are legal pragmatists. Legal pragmatism is forward-looking and policy-based. It focuses on the consequences of a decision in both the short and the long term, rather than on its antecedent logic. Legal pragmatism so understood is really just a form of ordinary practical reasoning, rather than some special kind of legal reasoning.
Supreme Court justices are uniquely free from the constraints on ordinary judges and uniquely tempted to engage in legislative forms of adjudication. More than any other court, the Supreme Court is best understood as a political court.
(20080211)Courts Books
Book Subjects
- Arts & Photography
- Audiobooks on Cassette
- Audiobooks on CD
- Biographies & Memoirs
- Business & Investing
- Children's Books
- Comics & Graphic Novels
- Computers & Internet
- Cooking, Food & Wine
- e-Books
- Engineering
- Entertainment
- Gay & Lesbian
- Health, Mind & Body
- History
- Home & Garden
- Horror
- Law
- Literature & Fiction
- Medicine
- Mystery & Thrillers
- Nonfiction
- Outdoors & Nature
- Parenting & Families
- Professional & Technical
- Reference
- Religion & Spirituality
- Romance
- Science
- Science Fiction & Fantasy
- Sports
- Teens
- Travel
Most talked about in Courts Books
Beat Your Ticket: Go to Court & Win (5th edition)by David Wayne Brown
NOLO; Published: 2007-08-15; Paperback; Book
Best price: $13.24
Price in other shops:
Federal Jurisdiction, Fifth Edition (Aspen Treatise)by Erwin Chemerinsky
Aspen Publishers, Inc.; Published: 2007-07-06; Paperback; Book
Best price: $50.70
Price in other shops:
Courtroom 302: A Year Behind the Scenes in an American Criminal Courthouseby Steve Bogira
Vintage; Published: 2006-02-14; Paperback; Book
Best price: $7.95
Price in other shops:
Ladies And Gentlemen Of The Jury: Greatest Closing Arguments In Modern Lawby Michael S Lief, Ben Bycel, H. Mitchell Caldwell
Scribner; Published: 2000-05-15; Paperback; Book
Best price: $4.99
Price in other shops:
Lincoln and the Courtby Brian McGinty
Harvard University Press; Published: 2008-02-28; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $15.79
Price in other shops:
Disorder in the Court: Great Fractured Moments in Courtroom Historyby Charles M. Sevilla
W. W. Norton & Company; Published: 1999-08-01; Paperback; Book
Best price: $8.07
Price in other shops:
The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Courtby Bob Woodward, Scott Armstrong
Simon & Schuster; Published: 2005-07-01; Paperback; Book
Best price: $9.49
Price in other shops:
Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial And America's Continuing Debate over Science And Religionby Edward J. Larson
Basic Books; Published: 2006-10-02; Paperback; Book
Best price: $6.27
Price in other shops:
How Judges Thinkby Richard A. Posner
Harvard University Press; Published: 2008-04-15; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $19.77
Price in other shops:
The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Courtby Jeffrey Toobin
Doubleday; Published: 2007-09-18; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $16.15
Price in other shops:
Similar Books and other products
Sway: The Irresistible Pull of Irrational Behaviorby Ori Brafman, Rom Brafman
Doubleday Business; Published: 2008-06-03; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $14.71
Price in other shops:
The Interpretation Gameby Robert Benson
Carolina Academic Press; Published: 2007-12-31; Perfect Paperback; Book
Best price: $19.90
Price in other shops:
Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-by-Numbers Is the New Way to Be Smartby Ian Ayres
Bantam; Published: 2007-08-28; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $14.00
Price in other shops:
The Little Book of Plagiarismby Richard A. Posner
Pantheon; Published: 2007-01-16; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $5.00
Price in other shops:
The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law (Princeton Studies in American Politics)by Steven M. Teles
Princeton University Press; Published: 2008-01-28; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $27.44
Price in other shops:
The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Courtby Jeffrey Toobin
Doubleday; Published: 2007-09-18; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $15.74
Price in other shops:
The Logic of Life: The Rational Economics of an Irrational Worldby Tim Harford
Random House; Published: 2008-01-15; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $12.97
Price in other shops:
Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisionsby Dan Ariely
HarperCollins; Published: 2008-02-19; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $13.17
Price in other shops:
Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happinessby Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein
Yale University Press; Published: 2008-04-08; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $13.00
Price in other shops:
Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judgesby Antonin Scalia, Bryan A. Garner
Thomson West; Published: 2008-04-28; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $16.47
Price in other shops: