 |
Book Reviews of 2061: Odyssey ThreeBook Review: did i miss something? Summary: 2 Stars
my book must have had half of the pages torn out or something, because there was barely any kind of description of anything in it. I have to be honest when i talk about 2061. I am a great fan of 2001 and 2010, but i must say this book really stinks. My book had LOTS of typos and grammer problems in it, and absoutely no description of anything important. I didn't learn a single thing about the space baby in this one. I feel like i could have read the last 5 pages of the book and understood the entire thing.
Book Review: Nothing important Summary: 2 Stars
You can read this book if you like, but I wouldn't recommend it. I think that the series should have ended with 2010, because it had the perfect open-ended way of finishing the series, and everything that had to be explained was explained but also something was left for the imagination of the readers. As a stand alone book, 2061 really isn't that bad, but as a part of the Odyssey series there is nothing really in it.
Book Review: Poor version of Delany's "Nova." Summary: 2 Stars
I keep waiting for Clarke to produce works of originality and substance, but this one was, unfortunately, a bad attempt at what Delaney did much better in "Nova." Though I respect Clarke tremendously, this was not his best work.
Book Review: What happened to the master??? Summary: 2 Stars
I am giving this one two stars out of respect for one of my favourite authors. I have 3001 at home but can't bring myself to read it.
Book Review: Waste of time - read his "Rendezvous With Rama" Summary: 1 Stars
Rendezvous With Rama was written in 1972, when he had some writing skills still. Skip this empty fluff and go with the 1st Rama book - it's 5 stars.
More Customer Reviews: 1 2 3 4
|
 |
|
|
|